Adults and children spending on 4 common items in UK in 1998
The table illustrates what percentage of female, male adults and children incomes’ spent on 4 various categories of items in UK, namely, food, electronic equipment, music, videos in 1998.
Overall, the adults spent most on food, which was almost greater 5 times from electronic equipment and music expenditures, whereas the children had a keen interest to pay out much more on music and videos rather than necessary staff like food, electronic equipment.
In terms of food, it can be seen that adults spend ¼ of their income on food. In detail, the women showed the largest spending, 39%, on food, while this figure accounted for 10% for men. With regards to video spending, only 1 percentage of young people expended on videos.
In 1998, the majority of children income was spent on music and electronic equipment, 39%, 23%, respectively. In comparison, only 5% of girls’ salary was preferred to spend on electronic equipment. Although the spending of boys is the lowest in food only 9%, the electronic and videos expenditures showed the exactly the same figures, 18%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-24 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | prathamp114 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | khuekhue | 42 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | khuekhue | 80 | view |
- Transportation modes in a European city 1960 2000 50
- Adults and children spending on 4 common items in UK in 1998 84
- Pollution levels in London, micrograms per cubic metre between 1600 and 2000. 78
- The two maps show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- CONSUMPTION OF SPREADS 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the exactly the'. Did you mean 'exactly the'?
Suggestion: exactly the
...ectronic and videos expenditures showed the exactly the same figures, 18%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owed the exactly the same figures, 18%.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80692613135 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3898791189 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197612667638 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878008215895 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814859232378 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13077463693 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837089395387 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.