Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to this problem?
In this contemporary scenario, there are ample of regions which face scarcity of water. It is an undeniable fact that dramatically surged supply of water has made it an overseas trouble. Nonetheless, Government is taking strict measures to overcome this problem. This essay will scrutinize the causes as well as the measures to undertake against this problem.
At the outset, there are a plethora of reasons behind the burgeoning demand of the water. The first and foremost is the population explosion. Nowadays, there are 7.5 billion individuals are living on the earth who necessitate water to fulfill their basic needs. Although the earth comprises of 71% water and 29% land but only 2% water is mineral and the remaining is saline water that contains a significant concentration of salt. Not just this, mankind wastes a lot of Adam's ale in their day to day activities. For instance, a recent survey shows that natives of Melbourne (Australia) used 250 liters of water per day. Moreover, another cause is an intense use of aqua in industrialization.
Considering the solutions, the administration should introduce stern legislative for the use of water. Also, high tariffs ought to be employed on the consumption of water. In addition, similar to the Singapore executive, there should be incentives along with the rewards who use limited water as it will assist the generation to utilize the water. Last but not least, awareness campaigns must be organized to make the people conscious about the importance of Adam's ale.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, Tackling a problem is a cup of tea if all the causes are well known. Additionally, Public and Government must join hands to handle this trouble.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | Gowridevaraj | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | mostafa jahangiri | 84 | view |
| 2018-04-23 | ctdcptn | 56 | view |
| 2017-01-29 | Stephanie Kaushal | 84 | view |
| 2017-01-29 | Stephanie Kaushal | 73 | view |
- Some people believe the youth can benefit from a wide range of information on the Internet while other people think unrestricted online information can affect the youth negatively. Discuss both views, and give your opinion. 89
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 78
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries. 11
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are actually important for a country. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...l their basic needs. Although the earth comprises of 71% water and 29% land but only 2% wate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92063419817 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9420972676 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3529411765 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116497668259 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424477935963 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545747412256 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815133864541 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602299552384 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.