Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.
What are your opinions on this?
In this pop culture and materialistic scenario, inhalation of various drugs has become a trend among youngsters as well as adults. However, it is a moot issue that whether tobacco products should be banned in office premises and other public places or not. I concur with this notion to a limited extent. This essay will scrutinize both virtues and will give a sophisticated solution.
There are a plenty of reasons that Government and private authorities should ban the smoking, as, this is an acceptable fact that smoking is injurious to health. Also, it causes numerous health problems such as lung cancer, throat cancer, respiratory problems, weakening of muscles and so on. Not just this, smoking is a passive activity which can cause health issues to the non-smokers just by inbreathe the smoke. For instance, an American survey has shown that almost 10% individuals suffer from breathing problems due to the smog of cigarettes.
On the flip side, if a government only ban the smoking in office premises while allows the production, vending and trading of such products than it raises a question if government seriously wants to ban cigarettes? Rather than imposing restrictions on the employee's government should obsolete the production of cigarettes. Apart from this, in lieu of the prohibition of the usage of smoking, the companies should update their policy of hiring and stop hiring the populace of chain smokers or they can also develop a different smoking room with proper ventilation so that it cannot ruin the office environment and smokers can fulfill their thirst.
Mulling over the topic, although smoking in no way acceptable but the alternative ways should opt for the smokers and it should be forbidden from public places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-17 | Nugman | 84 | view |
| 2017-02-04 | Stephanie Kaushal | 93 | view |
- A zoo has no useful purpose. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 11
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day.Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last ten years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 61
- In many countries schools have severe problems with students behaviour. what do you think are the causes of this? what solutions can you suggest? 56
- The chart below shows the sleep patterns of people in five different occupations according to a Canadian study. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ather than imposing restrictions on the employees government should obsolete the producti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and smokers can fulfill their thirst. Mulling over the topic, although smoking...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15087719298 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76546881922 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60350877193 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1223489027 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226060465236 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788273989099 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502369605194 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125017257327 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348446766715 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.