The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The bar chart depicts and compares the average releasing of the CO2 per individual in four European countries namely, the UK, Sweden, Italy, Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, although there was a descending trend in the UK and Sweden comparing to other European countries, the UK stayed the highest figure of the CO2 emission while Portugal was the latest country over the mentioned period.
From 1967 to 1977, Portugal, Italy, and Sweden were moderately increased their emission of CO2 per person to around 2.5, 6.5, and 10.5 metric tonnes respectively. However, the average of CO2 emission in the UK remained steady at about 11 metric tonnes.
In 1997 to 2007, the CO2 emission in the UK decreased slightly about 2 metric tonnes. Similarly, a dramatic drop in the average emission of the CO2 in Sweden by 3 metric tonnes and then its figure decreases gradually to reach roughly 5 metric tonnes. In contrast, Italy and Portugal saw a flactuated increase of the CO2 emission by 5, 3 metric tonnes respectively which then these figures remained constant in the end of the period ( 1997 to 2007).
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- People are not paying attention to environmental protection What is the cause and suggest solutions to deal with this issue 94
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mained constant in the end of the period 1997 to 2007.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95161290323 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60907835453 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6826242258 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279671391477 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147564233888 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441016585121 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181694678431 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512314812009 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.