The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the number of factors which are used to make electricity generation during the period between 1990 and 2010 in both New Zealand and Germany.
Overall, it is evident that the main source using mostly was coal except the case of Germany in 2010. It is clear that the total units of source in Germany was the highest by 214 units.
Firstly, in New Zealand, the number of coal units rose dramatically from 56 in 1980 to 120 in 2010, followed by hydro units in 2010 with roughly 16. On the other hand, there was a sudden decline in the number of natural gas units from 30 in 1980 to 2 in 2010. At the same time, the proportion of petroleum units fell steeply by 9 in 2010.
Besides, in Germany, the number of nuclear units is appeared, there was a sharp growth from 20 in 1980 to 155 in 2010. The proportion of coal units still stood at 28 through years. At the other extreme, there was a slight drop in the number of petroleum from 22 in 1980 to 27 in 2010. Similarly, the figure of natural gas went down enormously from 28 in 1980 to 2 in 2010, followed by hydro units with approximately 5 in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-12 | Vuong Linh | 61 | view |
- what are disadvantages and advantages of having older people living in the family home 73
- The best way to resolve the international enviromental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? What measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creat 61
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, similarly, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32242990654 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33508838911 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5184562979 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201138585281 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891296532327 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625928716184 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146342157393 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566392192497 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.