Language is an important tool for communication. Majority population of the world communicate in wide-spoken languages; meanwhile, languages spoked by a small group of people in a limited region are called small languages, which are facing the fate of extinction. Some people suggest that governments must spend money in protecting these small languages from disappearing; whereas, others think this approach is a waste of money. This essay will discuss about both views before concluding on a personal opinion.
People insist that governments ought to save small languages because language is a crusial media. Once a language dies, the culture, history and wisdom of the people who speak this language also extinct. For example, with the extinction of Maya language, the myththrious Maya history consealed with it. Therefore, some people propose that governments subsidize in protection of small language. The money that derived from public tax will play an important role in keep small languages from the danger of extinction.
Nonetheless, others rejects this proposal and believe it is a waste of money to spend national tax in protecting small languages. First, small languages are doomed to disappear as more and more people are speaking wide-spoken language. People nowadays are learning English, Chinese, French, Spanish and portugese as second language. Second, government fund in protecting small language is inefficient. Money will not deviate people’s need in learning wide-spoken languages to small languages. Thus, people oppose the suggestion that government spend money in protecting small languages.
In conclusion, contention arises regarding whether or not governments should provide financial support in protection of small language from extinction. Personally, I believe that governments should not subsidize in the preservation of small languages because that trend of language. More and more people speak wide-spoken language; in the mean time, fewer and fewer people speak small language. Small languages will extinct eventually.
- A friend from abroad is visiting your country next month. She is planning to stay with you but you can’t do so.•Tell her the reasons for that•Apologize to her•Make alternative arrangements 70
- You have been doing some voluntary work to help your local community. However, now you are unable to continue doing this work.Write a letter to the manager of the organisation where you have been working. In your letter:describe the work you have been doi 87
- The table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent 79
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...about both views before concluding on a personal opinion. People insist that governments ough...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 44, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...conclusion, contention arises regarding whether or not governments should provide financial su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77124183007 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95822221021 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493464052288 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1213751606 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9473684211 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378634019296 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138411534693 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823747896884 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26009250726 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381673627786 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.