The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The chart shows the percentage of people who lives in the UK involved in donating money to charity by age range in 1990 and 2010. The highest increase in charity is in the group of age 51-65 over this period.
As being seen, the rate of people who age 51 in 1990 to 65 in 2010 years went up by 4% from 35% to 39%. Likewise, there was an increased in the group of age more than 65 years, which grew a little from 32% to 35% over the twenty years.
On the other hand, the percentage of people donating money to charity in the group of age 35 - 50 was the highest in 1990, but it went down significantly from 42% to 35% in 2010. During this time, people who donated and aged between 26 and 35 years also dropped by 5%, which stood at 25% in 2010. Moreover, the rate of age 18 - 25 years fall dramatically from 17% to 7%.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 61
- some people think that young people should be free to choose any career they like while others say that they should think more realistically about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- Some people think young people should be free to choose his or her job but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think that cities are the best places to live Others prefer to live in a rural area Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city to living in the countryside Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 659.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.04294478528 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13273063112 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546012269939 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 183.6 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1656325686 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285431994212 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154612791379 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10852903033 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223737375113 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837734011797 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.43 61.2550243902 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.45 11.4140731707 57% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.23 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 40.7170731707 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.