The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The chart illustrates the generation of gross domestic product by two different industries in the UK over the period 1992 to 2000. Units are measured in percentages. Overall what stands out from the chart is that although the GDP created from both industries increased, information technology industry was considerably higher than service industry over the time frame mentioned in the question.
With regards to the information technology, even though the product stood at just over 6% in 1992, the proportion went up sharply to 8% in 1994 followed by a negligible drop to just under 8% in 1996. Over the
remaining four years, there was a rapid rise in the product to around 15.5%, making it the highest amount.
Turning to the service industry, beginning at 4% in 1992, there was a dramatic increase to around 6.5% in 1994. However, in the remaining last period, the industry witnessed a steady rise in the yield to just over 8%, which was nearly a half of other industry.
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 96
- Nowadays many people work from home. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation in particular and of technologically advanced society in general. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 85
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirementTo what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 55
- Money spent on exploration of space is a complete waste, it could be spend more effectively on improvements of living of people. To what extent do u agree disagree 85
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 0 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 782 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.711 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.682 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.765 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.143 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.663 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... drop to just under 8% in 1996. Over the remaining four years, there was a rapid ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9156626506 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7137868892 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5184429327 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129366798 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559324133993 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448806016928 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680067524319 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422611794721 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.