Leaders are essential to any country for smooth functioning, development and well-being of citizen. However, the question arises how the effectiveness of leader is assess. The given prompt argues that in order to determine leader potential, one should evaluate the well-being of the country’s citizen. Because of the availability of natural resources, presence of other index factor to determine leader competence, and policy and program that seem to be ineffective at present times but effective in future, I believe that prosperity of country’s citizen is not only the sole factor to determine leader potential.
Let consider the case: If the country having sheer natural resources utilizes such resources vastly, then without the effort of leader, the citizen can have prosperous life. You can take the example the Middle East countries such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia. Because these countries consist large amount of oil resources, citizen are having prosperous life through the allotment of oil export, without any significant role of leader to contributing in citizen welfare. In the other hand, countries in South East Asia like India, Pakistan have leader like Rajiv Gandhi, Manmohan Singh are considered as effective leader as they developed the economy of the country, scotch corruption, but the well-being of the citizen have trivial growth during their period.
In certain cases, the policy and program implemented by leader can cause dissatisfaction, but in the long run that implementation can be effective to the country. For instance, we can see many leader like Abram Lincoln were criticized for their giving rights to negro people at their contemporary time, but in the present day, such leader are recognized at the effective leader of their times. Similarly, we can hear that the Donald Trump is vituperated for causing much harassment for immigrant American citizen. So can we say that the Donald Trump is ineffective leader? Perhaps, like Lincoln, the answer lies in future progeny rather than at present times.
However, leader focusing on the well-being of the people are also considered competent leader. In Bhutan, there is separate ministry known as happiness ministry, which deals with people happiness. Quality of life is also a key index which represents the country development level, but in order to achieve it, at first, leader should focus on education, economic growth, infrastructure development as this parameter plays imminent role to increase quality of life of people. So, leader who advances the country towards this developmental parameter is also considered great leader.
In conclusion, due to above mentioned reasons; one should not determine the leader potential by only focusing on prosperity of citizen. Therefore, we have to focus, including people quality of life, on various parameters like development, education to determine leader potential.
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 33
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 71
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'assessed'.
Suggestion: assessed
...ises how the effectiveness of leader is assess. The given prompt argues that in order ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 504, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ffective at present times but effective in future, I believe that prosperity of country&a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49220489978 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90050418704 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510022271715 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6079331604 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.789473684 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218001900872 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784169661065 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479730740862 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121963189392 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641456392279 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.