Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face.
To what extent, do you agree or disagree
Mobile phone and computers are increasingly used by people in the modern life. It is agued that this practice leads to the losing of face to face communication ability of the users. I partly agree with this idea depending on how people use these technologies in their life.
On the one hand, when people use cell phones and computers, their face to face communication skills can be losen because of some main reasons. Firstly, when they use the high-tech equipments to play games, watch movies, read news, make a phone call, then they spend most of their free time with their own entertainment routines without communicating with their relatives or friends. As the result, they rarely talk with other people, and time to time, they may lose their ability to effectively communicate in face to face way. Secondly, some people tend to use their smart phones and computers connecting internet all day as a daily activity to satisfy their own dire needs in their own unreal world. They are more and more dependent on their own social network only availble on the internet and forget the real life with their own relations. Thus, they can not stand talking with other people and then lose their ability to communicate naturally in the real life.
On the other hand, mobile phone and computer can also help people gain some valuable skills on communicating with other people, even face to face interaction skills. smart phones and computer connecting internet enable users to conduct video chat which allows people see and talk to each other exactly as what they can do when facing in the real life. In addition, people draw inspiration from interesting TV programs that teach them how to communicate well in the real life. With the development of high-tech education game shows, people feel easily to assess a world of knowledge and experience in communication activities.
In conclusion, computers and cell phones may lead to losing of communication skills when people have face to face meeting. However, the high-tech equipments also help to improve the skills depending mostly on how they use the assets in their daily life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-27 | kiran pumbhadiya | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | kiran pumbhadiya | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | kiran pumbhadiya | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | DIPAN PATIDAR | 56 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree orr disagree with this statement. 78
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree orr disagree with this statement. 56
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Smart
..., even face to face interaction skills. smart phones and computer connecting internet...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97198879552 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59640144079 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6465464894 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334536101227 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143996553164 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766277007397 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239945042336 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464032541428 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.