The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The given pie chart depicts the information of units of electricity production by fuel source such as; Coal, Oil, Natural Gas, Hydro Power and Nuclear Power in Australia and France for the year 1980 and 2000. The data is calibrated in units.
At a first glance, considering Australia. In 1980, out of 100 total units, the highest unit of electricity was produced by coal, that is 50 units while, least production was done by Oil that is 10 units. Followed by Hydro Power and Natural Gas, which contributed equally that is 20 units. In 2000, out of 170 units, 130 units of electricity was generated by Coal while, Oil and Natural Gas generated least of all that is 2 units.
Furthermore, by looking at France's production. In 1980, there was an equal contribution of Coal and Natural Gas to produce electricity that is 25 units. Also, there was less units of electricity obtained by Hydro Power which is 15 units. In 2000, out of 180 units, Nuclear Power produced 126 units, which is the highest from among all the fuels. Followed by, Natural Gas and Hydro Power with generating only 2 units, which is least. Moreover, there is an equal participation of Coal and Oil that is 25 units.
In a nutshell, coal produce highest unit of electricity in Australia for both the year while, in France, there are fluctuation in every fuel contributing in both the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 56
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 62
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...produced by coal, that is 50 units while, least production was done by Oil that is 10 u...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...qually that is 20 units. In 2000, out of 170 units, 130 units of electricity was ...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun units is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...icity that is 25 units. Also, there was less units of electricity obtained by Hydro ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'produce the highest'.
Suggestion: produce the highest
...hat is 25 units. In a nutshell, coal produce highest unit of electricity in Australia for bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, look, moreover, so, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73529411765 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65476070407 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436974789916 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.445035873 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6923076923 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234178018298 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899013338465 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10957904499 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192184227698 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12241884137 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.