The bar chart illustrates the difference of fitness membership between men and women during a 30-year period.
It is clear that women has the highest membership throughout the period shown. While the number of men increases gradually, and the whole trend of women shows a great fluctuation.
In 1970, the number of fitness membership of female was 2000 which was 1000 more than that of male. Compared with the number of male, the female’s membership remained in a high level during the next two decades. In the year 1985, the fitness member of men peaked at approximately 2800. However, there was a slight drop of nearly 400 in the number of women.
In 1995, the male member peaked at 2800 again, and the number of female had a dramatic rise to 5000, the highest record of the women. In the year 2000, there was a decline of 800 in the number of men, whereas the number of women had dramatic drop of 4000.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 56
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Study Sample 63
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65644171779 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48176002546 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.031428569 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150127024018 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700363570062 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596772992813 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989754324074 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478426061169 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.