increase petrol tax in order to decrease traffic and pollution. Do you agree?
In the wake of social development, green issues have become more serious than ever. Therefore, whether should the government raise the tax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debate issue.
My view is that the gas cost should definitely be elevated.
It is irrefutable that an enormous number of vehicles on the road is the main reason which cause traffic congestion as well as pollution. In these regards, a huge amount of emission and toxic gas that comes from these automobiles could worsen environmental situations. Therefore, if the government increases the affordable price of petrol, there would be less frequently used means of transport and solving the problems as well. Furthermore, in many countries, the taxes on personal car owners have decrease, which leads to the bombing of vehicles in inner cities. To illustrate, in 2015 in Vietnam, the cars taxes have gone down to 0% and the traffic jams have happened more regularly since then. Thus, the idea that the authorities lifting gas taxes should be launched as soon as possible.
Despite it is advantageous, there are detrimental effects too. For people whose works depend mostly on cars like taxi drivers, it of course, might be their worst nightmare. Nevertheless, they could improve the prices to work it out.
In conclusion, it can be said that by lifting the gasoline prices, traffic and smog would be vanished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | kelvin sandi | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Mollymaul | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Arun rathour | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | Aarti sharma | 84 | view |
- should children learn all subject? 78
- should people change or not? 78
- increase tax on petrol. do u agree? 78
- Essay topics: consumers are faced with increasing number of advertisments from conpeting companies. to what extent do you think are consumers influenced bay advertisments? what can be done to protect them? 89
- Should higher fuel price? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('highly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
...ax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debate issue. My view is that the gas cost s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75790534025 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6261445287 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6923076923 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126899522556 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038312256618 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390382308465 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515166732952 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529227135288 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.