The graph compares the proportions of people who donating in Britain by five age groups in two years (1990 and 2010).
It is clear that while individuals in 36-50 age group had the highest donation percentage in 1990, this place changed to people aged between 51 and 65 in the year 2010. In addition, after the period of 20 years, the overall proportion of British citizens giving donation decreased.
For the 18-25 age group, while more than 16% of them donated money in 1990, by 2010, this rate had declined to only 6%. Likewise, the percentage of people aged 26 to 35 giving donation had a 7% decrease over the 20 years period to 24%. In 1990, the proportion of donation giver in the 36-50 age group was highest, at more than 40%, however, this rate then decreased dramatically to merely 35% in 2010.
For the oldest age group, the proportion of people giving money jumped slightly from 32% in 1990 to 35% in 2010. In addition, after 20 years, 51-65 age group became the highest figure in the graph. By 2010, this rate had risen to nearly 40%.
- Comparison of car theft 73
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 71
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 84
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57671957672 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32221492885 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513227513228 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7266715736 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221124018758 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114842595947 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647409893184 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164864382579 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142523720315 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.