The reading and lecturer discussing about how to protect the Torreya trees from declining it's population but in very contrasts ways. The professor refutes the all points made in the reading passages.
Firstly, reading says that micro climate will be feasible for growing these trees because still north part of the Florida still wet and coolest, So, planting the seeds will assist the tree grow in the tampest area of northern part in order prevent declining of it's population. But, the lecture refuses that because of global warming this place already became dry. So, he states that it is not suitable place to grow these trees.
Secondly, passage claims that migrating the tree far to north the forest of the Florida by sapling the seeds, so that, entire state gets more of these trees everywhere like earlier. Again, the speaker opposes this point by stating with one example that the black locus tree which caused so many problems for the native species. Like that, migration of Torreya's seeds also will lead to the same problem and it is dangerous the plants which are the already, like competing for resources.
Thirdly, reading argues that keeping wild seeds in large amount in research and looking for feasible environment by analysing it will help the scientist to preserve these trees in large area of the state. Still, the professor contrasts this statement by saying that when the trees are there in original place, it gives the resistance the diseases whereas keeping the seeds in lab cannot develop resistance against the diseases because there is genetic capacity to prevent when it lab environment. So, they cannot survive in long term. Further, keeping large amount seeds highly impossible due to lack space.
The reading passage states that the prevent the decline of Torreya by using micro climate, migration of it seeds and keeping in the lab. But, the speaker refutes all these by giving reasonable evidence that is not practically possible to do so.
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- Cycling is more environmental friendly than any other form of transportation. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity ? 84
- A/D ? Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opulation. But, the lecture refuses that because of global warming this place alr...
^^
Line 9, column 33, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ace. The reading passage states that the prevent the decline of Torreya by using micro c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is not practically possible to do so.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03039513678 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32855315809 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525835866261 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5698207271 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.214285714 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250923488486 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787006270172 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644638502841 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132924931576 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247117111583 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.