agree or disagree: Although most people know about environmental problems, it so unlikely for these problems to be solved in future.
By and large, in today’s sophisticated day and age we observe, environmental issues have gained much prominence and attention. That being said, it is not far-fetched to find some debate and controversy surrounding some of its aspects, namely whether it is solvable in future or not. One popular opinion regarding this issue states that, although people care about environmental problems, it is not solvable in future. I personally repudiate this thesis. As what follows, I will pinpoint some of the outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that, by developing advanced technology, some kind of environmental pollution such as air pollution will decrease significantly. Take the electrical transportation vehicle as an example. This technology is replacing with fuel combustion motor vehicles. As we all know fossil fuels pump a plethora of hazardous gasses which are one of the most important reasons of global warming and expanding in the hole of the Ozone layer. Cutting down on this kind of fuel, governments can profoundly decrease air pollution. Nowadays, this technology such as electric cars and buses are using in some countries such as Japan and China and in future, it will be using more and more in other countries as well. So by this fast pace technology development, it is not far reaching that environmental problems will be decreased.
The other significant reason which deserves some words is that peoples as an individual care more about the environment in which they live in compared with the past. Of course, enacting some rules and also the massive efficient advertisements in media, governments play a crucial role to paves the way for having less environmental problems for people. For instance, cutting down a tree or damaging them, one is penalized by the government. Besides people are more aware of the importance of the environment for their living by advertisement and they also try their best to do not cause harm by making pollution or damaging it. Another example which is worth to mention is waste segregation which really helped to decrease the harmful wasting in the environment and recycling some other kind of them which can be used again. What may come as a surprise are the results of a study conducted at the University of Sharif in my country indicating that after making trash separation compulsory in here, the environmental problems due to this issue has decreased by 50 percent.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that, environmental issues can be solving by brilliant technology and individual awareness of conserving the environment. So it is anticipated that we can be the witness of a clearance environment undoubtedly in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-28 | taraneh taj | 76 | view |
- TPO 31Do you agree or disagree whit the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
- TPO 24 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 32Young people today have no influence on the important that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
- TPO 34Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 90
- animal's fossils containing actual tissues 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ironmental problems, it is not solvable in future. I personally repudiate this thesis. As...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hesis. As what follows, I will pinpoint some of the outstanding reasons. The first exquisi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 671, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e countries such as Japan and China and in future, it will be using more and more in othe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...em, one is penalized by the government. Besides people are more aware of the importance...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... of a clearance environment undoubtedly in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, really, regarding, so, well, for instance, kind of, of course, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16517857143 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0931508387 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8709943644 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216938776529 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592133432437 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588791765973 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132120716038 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208785203965 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.