The reading and the lecture give contradictory opinion on whether the employees work for 4 days a week is beneficial or not. The reading states that working a four day workweek for less payment would benefit the economy, the individual companies and the employees who will take this option. The professor suggests that working four days a week will not effect the economy and the employees lives in way of the reading suggests. And he provides several reasons.
First, the professor rejects the claim in the reading that shortened workweek will increase company profits. And he says that this will force the companies to pay more. They will try to hire more workers, and these workers will need training. So the company will pay more for the training and for their medical benefits. Moreover, this will cost the company the same if their workers work for four days or five days. In addition, the more workers will need more office spaces and more computers. And thus will cut into the companies profits.
Second, the lecture explains that working four days a week would not decrease unemployment because companies may take other options like let their workers take an overtime job. And may company will increase its expectations about their workers, and if this happens there is no more additional jobs, and the worker will be pleasant to do their job.
Finally, the paragraph says that four day workweek working would be better for the workers lives. They will have extra time to spend with their families. The lecture suggests quite opposite in this case as well. It says that this will present risk to the workers' quality of life because this will decrease the employees' job ability, and this will prevent them from getting advancement in their carrier. Meanwhile, they will lost their job first and they will not get paid over because companies will prefer the workers who work five days a week.
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other student prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer . Use reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 26 Agree Disagree It s better for children choose jobs that are similar to their parent jobs than to choose job that are very different from their parents jobs 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 50
- what is important skill a person should learn in order to be successful in the world today? 60
- what is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmental problems 1 fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power 2 protect forests and natural wildlife species 3 pass and enforce laws to reduce 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he employees who will take this option. The professor suggests that working four da...
^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... that working four days a week will not effect the economy and the employees lives in ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rker will be pleasant to do their job. Finally, the paragraph says that four da...
^^
Line 4, column 426, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
... in their carrier. Meanwhile, they will lost their job first and they will not get p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 5.04856512141 515% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87345679012 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31085875944 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469135802469 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.51434878587 528% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9202333616 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7222222222 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.