Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which people establish diverse kinds of relationships with each other within the society which in they live, it is not far-fetched to presume that communities, as in integral part of society, play the crucial role to that end. However, what is the extent of people's commitments in terms of contributing to these unions is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that individuals do not spare sufficient time to care their societies. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the cost of living is increasingly steeped. There is no denying the fact that so busy are people virtually with their jobs that no time left for doing their favorable deeds. In metropolises, people work at least ten hours a day to scrap a living. According to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highly respected professor in the Department of Economy at University of Macquarie, the number of people living under poverty line has increased drastically. His research revealed that the peak destitution rate was reached in Oct 2016 by 18% and it had surged by 8% in comparison the last year. This probe provides further legitimacy to this idea that a plethora of people has no other choice but merely spending their time and effort to make their living. Undoubtedly, in this circumstance, having found their families in jeopardy, citizens do not make a point of assisting the rest of the community's members.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is the public perspective regarding the government supports from vulnerable people. Needless to say that nowadays, particularly in developed countries, individuals are of the opinion that these communities have been instituted in order to facilitate the situation for whom require special treatment and care. For instance, diverse types of health services, both mental and physical, high social security, and retirement or unemployment insurance are the examples of supports that governors provided for their people who cannot live on their own. It comes as no surprise if the role of people in the communities become questionable and somehow meaningless. Subsequently, they opt to set new priorities for themselves when there are myriad other challenges that they should overcome.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that people do not spend adequate time to their societies. This issue occur not only due to they are enaged with the matter which have more priorities for them, but laso since they count on supports which may recieve from their governors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
- TPO 21 81
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 80
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 60
- Agree or disagree. Government should spend more on early education than on college education. 73
- TPO 8 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12114537445 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88781976555 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570484581498 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1217878829 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19064184962 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590559386794 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556750494103 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120023771898 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295018235691 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.