TPO 13
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three major implications for historic sites' excavation by the private sector. However, findinf all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor cats doubt on what is presented in the text and states that regardless of some detrimental consequences, the reading exagrated regarding the problems. Therefor, she stated some evidence to refudiate the adverse issue mentioned in the passage.
At first, the author argues that the public becomes deprived of getting acquainted with fossel due to their absence in the museums. Convesrely, the lecturer bring up the idea that private ownerships present a lot of these fossile for being purchased. Cinsequently, these fossile are available for many public organizations and libraries to buy.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that scientists miss accessing to numbers of fossile since they are being collected by the rich private collectors. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this point by clarifying the fact that this justification is not realistic. Indeed, in order to put price on the fossiles, its value should be scientifially identified. Having scrutinized the deatils of fossils to state their experis opinion, the scientists have a wide access to the entire fossiles that had benn unerathed by the private sector. Thus, undoubtedly, their limited budget to discover the fossils has nothing o do with their restrained accessible to them.
Finally, the author asserts that the privates sector diminishs some precious scientific evidence while they dig up the sites due to lack of sufficient knowledge and skill in this field. The professor, though, disputes this idea by subscribing the fact that if this segment does not uncover the sites, numerous of fossiles will remain undiscovered. As a matter of fact, universities or other institutions do not have much contrubution and attempt in this regard. Thus, whether it would be better to discover the fossile partially or left them undiscovered completely? Needless to say that the first solution has a vareity of advantages.
- Has the ease of the cooking improved life? 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO 3 - Integrated:Rembrandt portrait -the woman with fur collar- 85
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 85
- TPO43 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'wide access'.
Suggestion: wide access
...ir experis opinion, the scientists have a wide access to the entire fossiles that had benn un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'privates'' or 'private's'?
Suggestion: privates'; private's
... Finally, the author asserts that the privates sector diminishs some precious scientif...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, thus, while, in addition, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38855421687 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94341535165 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599397590361 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1613445212 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8125 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323525416316 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988403901448 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860406277723 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186052224212 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962672448614 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.