The given graph illustrates the information regarding carbon dioxide emitted by each person during 40 years (1967-2007) in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.
According to the graph, it is manifest that UK possesses the most carbon dioxide emission in the year 1967 by near 11 in metric tonnes per person, and it was pursued be Sweden (over 8 in metric tonnes). On the flip side, the minimum of carbon dioxide produced in Portugal (only over in metric tonnes) in 1967, although each person in Italy was liable for 4 metric tonnes of CO2 emission in the same year.
On the other hand, Portugal and Italy faced an upward trend in producing carbon dioxide until 2007 and accounted for near 5 and 8 in emission in metric per person, while Sweden mere experienced a swift boom up to 1977 above 10 and then sharply slumped to below 6. In contrast, United Kingdom encountered a moderate fall from 1967 to 2007 and stood on about 9 metric tonnes emitted carbon dioxide per person.
To sum up, it is distinctively transparent that except Sweden and UK other nations didn’t have a smart management in controlling the emission of the toxic gases (CO2).
- Thbar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in 1998 and 2005Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 89
- Young people spend their free time in shopping malls. This has negative effects on young people and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, while, in contrast, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7960199005 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53614254517 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572139303483 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8626905189 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325168554811 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177676354031 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590211873128 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200740417549 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07938276531 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.