The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993and March 1999.
The presented line chart illustrates how the proportion of people who not have job changes during 6 years in 2 countries, namely Japan and US.
It can be seen clearly that the unemployment rates in the US increased dramatically, whereas one in Japan had a remarkable reduction.
In March 1993, the percentage of unemployment in Japan started at 2.5 %, less than 4.5% that of in US. In the period from 1993 to 1995, the Japan’s unemployment rates climbed slightly and stood at above 35 out of 100 in 1995; on the other hand, US experienced a significant drop to 5.5 % at the same time. After that, the propotion of people who have no job in Japan shooted up approximately 4.5% while that of in the US fluctuated and stayed at nearly 5% in March 1996.
In the following years, unemployment rates in Japan had fluctuation and reached at peak in March 1998, at above 5 percent, then uping and downing around 5 %. This figure was the propotion of people who underwork in the US in March 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-09 | Soroush.z | 11 | view |
| 2017-05-31 | tramhuynh123 | 84 | view |
| 2015-05-29 | jyothi2410 | 60 | view |
| 2015-03-29 | nundc | 70 | view |
- : Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The average temperatures 78
- Hjjv 11
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in differents years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sit down restaurants. 56
- sfasfas 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in US. In the period from 1993 to 1995, the Japan's unemployment rates clim...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates climbed slightly and stood at above 35 out of 100 in 1995; on the other hand...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62146892655 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84116564498 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5752963556 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317396301342 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16380282751 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618564656139 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186999996733 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790769164231 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.