Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Millions of languages are being spoken around the world. Nevertheless, it is expected that in a near future, there may be only one global language which is used. This seems to be a positive social development, however, I would argue that this would be a detriment to the diversity of humankind.
In the first place, language stands for cultural diversity and historical values of every nation. It is linked to human’s regions, beliefs, and lifestyles. Using only one language would be likely to contribute to the disappearance of these precious aspects of human’s life. If we all speak the same language, it would eliminate the key point to distinguish people from different parts of the world with different cultural identities. Moreover, language symbolizes people’s origins and defines their characters.
For instance, France has been known as the land of romance, which is because French is the language of love.
On the other hand, this development also has positive sides. A global language will be the facilitation of international communication. It can get rid of linguistic barrier in human’s life and helps everyone from all over the world understand each other much more easily.
In conclusion, using a universal language has benefits, however, I personally think it has more drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | phg_phg | 84 | view |
| 2017-06-02 | lenguyenynhitk | 78 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 78
- In the past people used to travel abroad to look many differences from their home country Nowadays the sceneries in places all over the world are more and more similar What are the causes of the similarities Do you think the advantages of this similarity 82
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 73
- Some people say material possessions are very useful in bringing us happiness but others argue that they are useless in terms of providing happiness Discuss both views and give your own opinion and reasons 71
- The following pie charts show the results of a survey into the most popular leisure activities in the United States of America in 1999 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10330516783 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2937977105 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2307692308 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0769230769 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132550308259 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457510935708 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051619999743 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062694265369 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039755973535 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.