There are thousands of languages being spoken in many nations around worldwide. However, according to many professional scientists, only one common linguistic will exist as a means of communication among people in the foreseeable future. From my perspective, although this development is the facilitation of international communication, it is a detriment to our lives for the following reasons.
On the one hand, if we all spoke the same language, we would create a bridge to harmonize and understanding between different cultures and countries. It would eliminate the gap that keeps a group of people away from others as we all have a sense of similarity in communication language. Thus, we can comprehend more profoundly numerous cultures and conventionals that used to be somewhat misinterpreted due to a linguistic barrier.
On the other hand, a part of a country’s core identity would be on the brink of extinction if there were only one familiar language. Linguistic plays an indispensable role in human’s lives because it is not only is the way people living in the same society communicate but also symbolizes their origins and defining characters. Therefore, eliminate much linguistics also mean that destroy the diversity of cultures and histories around the globe. For instance, Vietnamese citizens have been known for their heroism and patriotism through words of their anthems and it has become an essential part of their pride, so we cannot deny or demolish that. What is more, live in a world that using no more than one language would make interpreters become unemployed so that they have to find other occupations that are suitable for their career pathways. This is damage to the life of residents who are really passionate about being an interpreter.
To conclude, several scientists predict that in the foreseeable years all the people around the world will just speak only one common communication linguistic. I believe that global language change poses a significant danger to human identity, culture, and history, even if it helps, to some extent, alleviate language obstacles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29761904762 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10720557317 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0975317465 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100934495713 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349868646553 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332626986514 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070933932149 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478120323577 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.