The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The issue at hand states that, in order to prepare the youngsters for leadership, they must be instilled with a sense of cooperation, rather than competition. This is true from almost every aspect, since it catalyzes the production of both leaders and managers!
It is a well reknown fact that cooperation promotes a sense of amity and team work. This environment facilitates the moulding of leaders, by instilling a need to achieve unity withing the team. When a person works in a group, he is bound to experience a variety of scenarios, both favorable and unfavorable. But, in the process, he also learns how to face these scenarios. So he intentionally or unintentionally, takes up the role of a leader. And as a leader, he strives towards achiving unity within the team, by cooperation among members. As a result, this leader is capable of making the group work like a well oiled machine!
Let us look at the example set by a club in our university, namely 'IE Biotechnology'. The club members have shared an intra-club rivalry, for the postition of club president, for over 8 months. This went on until last month, when they decided to restructure the entire club, by creating several deparments. Each department was assigned a head, and was highly codependant on every other department for one's work to make sense. In this way, the communication between the departments increased, forcing them to inculcate the ideology of cooperation and fealty. And the heads of the department learned how to take charge, and communicate well to get work done. Thus through this ideology of cooperation, we notice the formation of multiple capable leaders instead of just one.
Additionally, there are drawbacks in competition due to which we must not go in that direction. Even though the competition is healthy, there is always the latent need to put another down, in order to succeed. This is not the culture that a leader must have.
Although, competition is effective as a mehod, cooperation is the healthier and more effective option. And thus to prepare more young leaders in the world, we must take up 'cooperation', as we have clearly seen from the success story of IE Biotechnology.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 78
- AsthmaAsthma is ussually seen as a condition whose symptoms can be adequately controlled with the right medicines. Researchers point out that it is an intermittent disorder,characterized by temporary bouts of inflammation of the airways,which lead to typ 3
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Asthma 3
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t on until last month, when they decided to restructure the entire club, by creat...
^^
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and communicate well to get work done. Thus through this ideology of cooperation, w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, still, thus, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96195652174 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00598017695 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6827329771 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135680468502 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349627101452 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600139291978 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744441476878 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671071917347 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.