The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of school children’s attending different kind of school between the years 2000 to 2009. Looking at the overall trend it is evident that preference of pupil changed and more people attended the community schools, in comparison to other specialist school whereas pupil opt out themselves.
To begin with voluntary-controlled schools the proportion fell from 50% to 20% in a decade’s time. Similarly relative number of children in grammar schools also opts out and the number is relatively quite significant, these school witnessed decline of 50%. Specialist schools are also under the same kitty wherein they also feel the heat, but not that significant they saw a decline of only 2% which is very marginal.
However, where some school witnessed the sharp decline, on the contrary the community schools are on the one where pupil opts in more. In the year 2000 only 12% were educated in this kind of school, but by the year 2009 the number saw huge rise and 58% were educated.
- Nowadays many parents believe that children’s usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such belief? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 78
- Nowadays many parents believe that children’s usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such belief? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 51
- Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 73
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference. 78
- Nowadays airline providers more benefits to the rich, often achieving this by reducing areas used by the economy class to provide more comfort to1st class passengers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statements? Give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...rom 50% to 20% in a decade's time. Similarly relative number of children in grammar ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line of only 2% which is very marginal. However, where some school witnessed the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er saw huge rise and 58% were educated.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, similarly, so, whereas, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09467455621 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91880962022 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9985422361 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 5.23603664747 254% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209786872578 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102493494525 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684586849748 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152620443741 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714748723447 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.