tpo integrated 18
The Article states that there are three methods to save Torreya taxifoha. However the lecture claims that non of the three ways provided in the articles are satisfactory solutions to save Torreya taxifoha and refutes each of the author methods.
First, the articles argue that. The best way to save Torreya taxifoha is by restore the tree to their original climate in Florida. In Florida the climate is cooler and suitable for the ever green to grow. The professor opposes this point by stating that reestablish the tree is unlikely to be successful. He states that the original location is strongly affected by climate changes for example, the weather become dryer because of the wet land drange and the global warming. He then explains that restore of the trees to the original place is not a convincing solution to save the torreya taxifoha.
Second the reading claims that torryea seeds and can be successfully be planting in other place rather than Florida. The professor refutes this point by saying that some other plant like the black locos tree when human being try to transfer them to other place un predicted out come happened. For example, the black locos tree spreeded so quickly and kill other plants and trees. The professor explains that assisted migration is not helpful as well.
Third, the article posit that seeds and sapling of terryea could be preserved in research centers, that will help researches and ensure the continue survival of the trees. However the professor opposes this point by talking about kept the trees in researches center is not realistic. He mentioned that trees to survive the disease should be relatively large and genetically diverse, but the researches center will not have enough capacity to keep those trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The Article states that there are three ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...three methods to save Torreya taxifoha. However the lecture claims that non of the thre...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...futes each of the author methods. First, the articles argue that. The best...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. The best way to save Torreya taxifoha is by restore the tree to their original...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to save the torreya taxifoha. Second the reading claims that tor...
^^^^
Line 8, column 281, Rule ID: OUT_COME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outcome'?
Suggestion: outcome
...ansfer them to other place un predicted out come happened. For example, the black locos ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gration is not helpful as well. Third, the article posit that seeds and ...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 143, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s, that will help researches and ensure the continue survival of the trees. However the prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ure the continue survival of the trees. However the professor opposes this point by tal...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, well, for example, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07167235495 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40517735311 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518771331058 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9465855828 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272584472629 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919015330659 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561873868116 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152921577494 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181208431504 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.