tpo13
Both the reading and the lecture are about private collectors who are interested to buy ancient fossils for their private institutions. The reading provides three reasons that this occurrence has increased during these years and it can have destructive consequence. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article and the professor finds all arguments unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading declares that such an event can have negative impact on public because if fossils are not set in the museums, humans will not be able to observe them; consequently, their exciting will subside toward dinosaurs. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She points out that since public states such as library or school does not have enough budget to provide a huge amount of these fossils; therefore, people will be reluctant to visit these places but private collections can attract numerous people due to a variety of ancient fossils.
Secondly, the article contends that during privatizing fossils, researchers will lose the most important data because the ambitious collectors will buy all of fossils with any price; subsequently, researchers would not trace the extinct life forms in the past. This argument is rebutted by the professor. She believes that before any activity, such worthwhile fossils have to be evaluated by the scholars; hence, the scientist can obtain useful and need information through this rout.
Finally, the reading passage states that the buyers are not instructed, so they do not take the fossils into account as a strong source for perceiving the past. Such selfish collectors only try to discover a lot of fossils as soon as much possible without paying attention to scientific aspects of bones; conversely, the professor proposes that since the wealthy people have an opportunity for more excavations, so numerous fossils will be unearthed by them. This state can provide a research bed for scientists to study the ancient animals, its behavior, anatomy and etc.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 565, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... ancient animals, its behavior, anatomy and etc.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25696594427 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72374040643 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.3762654226 49.2860985944 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370600169642 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124047816126 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974390159633 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225779971432 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522674137751 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.