Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the number of vehicles with self-driving feature, raising many question of road safety. Given that this pattern could be attributed to many reasons, the advantages are outweighed by the disadvantages.
There are a multitude of reasons why future cars will be driven by computers. First, there is no requirement for drivers’ licenses or challenging driving tests. In fact, Acquisition of driving knowledge and driving practices demand for a great deal of physical attempt, costing unnecessary time and money. Second, Sensory technology with analytical algorithm could potentially perceive the environment of roads better than human senses associated with poor visibility. This means that these advanced features would detect small and treacherous obstacles on roads very fast, lessening the possibilities of accidents.
However, this advancement in transportation methods is not without drawbacks. First, an autonomous car is invariably correlated with exorbitant price, going beyond the affordability of many individuals. For instance, a driverless vehicle will normally cost three times as much as a traditional one, which cannot be purchased by low-income citizens. In addition, even one minor error in the controlling system could culminate in more repercussions relating to physical injuries than human’s error. For example, Crashes in driving computer could be conducive to the likelihood of hitting other nearby vehicles, leading to many fatalities.
In conclusion, this commuting pattern could come from many factors in terms of no physical effort and advanced technology. However, besides high price, the downsides pertaining to this mode of transportation could lead to many undesirable consequences when it comes to computer failure.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outwiegh the disadvantages? 11
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote naturalenvironment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with thisdevelopment? 67
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree? 86
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical day in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun question seems to be countable; consider using: 'many questions'.
Suggestion: many questions
...cles with self-driving feature, raising many question of road safety. Given that this pattern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87452471483 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17745167774 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673003802281 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2170884684 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841091746529 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408983121123 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10386119679 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469999917139 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408573790576 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.