The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002.
The given table illustrates, six demographic indicators of Australia and Malaysia in the year of 1980 and 2002.
Overall, total population was increased in both countries considerably while Malaysia was in peak position from 13.4 to 23.7million. Whereas, in Malaysia(1.2% to 1.3%) average annual growth rate was decreased slightly as compared to Australia about 2.4% to 2.1%.
In terms of male and female population was same in Australia in given period around 49.1% and 50.1% respectively. Whilst, in Malaysia, male growth rate was comparatively high(approximately 50.3% to50.6%) as compared to female, which was relatively decreased from 40.9% to 40.7%.
Nevertheless, birth rate was decreased in both countries during the years Malaysia was in high position with 3.2% to 2.2%. Australia was only 1.3% to 1.2%. Furthermore, elderly population was increased in both countries by the period, Australia hold the peak place with 9.6% to 12.4%. Whereas, Malaysia rose mere3.7% to 4.3%.
- The diagrams below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.You should write at least 150 words. 78
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statements 59
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experi 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 78
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... six demographic indicators of Australia and Malaysia in the year of 1980 and 200...
^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compared to female, which was relatively decreased from 40.9% to 40.7%. Never...
^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% to 40.7%. Nevertheless, birth rate was decreased in both countries during t...
^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... both countries by the period, Australia hold the peak place with 9.6% to 12.4%...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Australia) must be used with a third-person verb: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
... countries by the period, Australia hold the peak place with 9.6% to 12.4%. Wh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Australia hold the peak place with 9.6% to 12.4%. Whereas, Malaysia rose m...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ralia hold the peak place with 9.6% to 12.4%. Whereas, Malaysia rose mere3.7...
^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ld the peak place with 9.6% to 12.4%. Whereas, Malaysia rose mere3.7% to 4.3%.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54304635762 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08118587826 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2448275844 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205549229423 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1059946524 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077992085279 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159446735732 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920490455901 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.