The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart describes the small, medium and large businesses in the UK with the support of social media over five consecutive years from 2012 to 2016. Units are measured in percentage.

Overall, the presence of media helps the overwhelming majority of large businesses in the given years. However, there was a slight decline in all kinds of businesses in 2015.

From the beginning of 2012, the influence of public media support of small businesses helps to achieve about 28% which increases to 30% of growth in the years 2013 and 2015. The highest development in small businesses was in 2016 with 49%. When compared to medium businesses, the chart shows approximately the same percentage during the years 2012 and 2015 with around 30%. Whereas there was a gradual improvement seen in other years such as businesses reached to 50% and ended with 52% in 2016.

However, the large businesses were the topper among them. From the start of the period itself, they have a 78% growth in enterprises which continues to the next year. While the consecutive years there was a slight drop in businesses and reached 51% in 2015. However, at the end of the period, it returns the businesses to the earlier times with 79%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-08 minhpn 67 view
2021-11-15 eyraen 73 view
2021-09-06 minhpn 63 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nesses in 2015. From the beginning of 2012, the influence of public media supp...
^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring the years 2012 and 2015 with around 30%. Whereas there was a gradual improve...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86538461538 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58909296219 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1893551306 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193570294809 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731427924974 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067056461746 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137339851219 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683466785162 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.