Some people belive that people who read books
can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is believed that books help learners develop language skills and imagination better than TV. I partly agree that books are considerably better than TV.
On the one hand, there are benefits related to improving language skills and the ability to imagine.First of all, it is difficult to have a good grasp of books' content if readers do not engage their imagination while they are reading. As a result, they will improve their imagination as long as they read regularly. In addition, a lot of books written by authors contain their writing styles. Because most of them make the grade, language learners are able to learn grammar and lexical resources as accurately as what they learn from professional people. In particular, they only have to understand deeply how authors write and how to use the relevant vocabulary in specific situations.
On the other hand, TV encourages aspects of learning language that using solely books does not offer. The majority of people do not speak out loud and they also use their eyes only. In contrast, watching TV involves both listening and understanding information that people in TV mentioned. Therefore, it is likely that learners will be better at assimilating pieces of information they heard. They can also speak as perfect as native speakers by imitating the ways speakers talk to each other.
In conclusion, it seemed to me that both watching TV and reading books are important for learners to enhance their language skills and imagination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | Pham Van Nhan | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-11 | Rida | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | jenny0918 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-27 | Kaur man | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-20 | khiemtotet | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...guage skills and the ability to imagine.First of all, it is difficult to have a good ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their language skills and imagination.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in particular, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08130081301 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7789421844 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565040650407 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5988032848 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1538461538 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188765196936 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745972900793 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662986227186 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133987650083 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480045189561 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.