In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In some nations, developing traffic is a controversial issue. Many people argue that spending big amount of expenditure on installation of new railway system for high speed trains between municipalities is essential wheres others think governments should spend money on upgrading current communal vehicles. I partially support these points due to the following reasons.
On the one hand, it is important to invest in very fast railway carriage because its remarkable benefits can offer to us. Firstly, it helps inhabitants saving travel time effectively, For instance, traveling by bus can take 2 hours for 100 km distance while high speed train can take just 30 minutes. Therefore, travellers have more time to do other things. Moreover, it makes a significant contribution in the development of many segments such as economy, society,service and so on. Because thanks to this modern means of transport, delivery and connection between different cities can become more uncomplicated. Thereby, trade and cultural exchanges will be promoted dramatically.
On the other hand, improving present shared conveyance should not be overlooked due to its own justifiable grounds. Admittedly, if it is achieved, inhabitants will be encouraged significantly to use public transports. It can lead to redundancy of traffic jams and pollution, economy on energy. As we have known, these are important and ubiquitous problems in need of solutions. In contrast, if governments do not take attention in this matter, tremendous consequences of fields as environment, economy, society can not be avoidable.
Nowadays, advancing transportation have become to the central of public attention. While some people believe authorities should have a huge investigation in up-to-date railway lines for high speed trains, others argue that current communal vehicles should be upgraded. I think these matters need similar priorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: where's
...ins between municipalities is essential wheres others think governments should spend m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , service
...f many segments such as economy, society,service and so on. Because thanks to this moder...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64583333333 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21178115606 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6697617825 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240684502928 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05877334085 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675372330925 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149221649469 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649614453305 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.