Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is generally accepted that sharing much information in the academic field is considered to be good, whereas many people put forward the idea that some crucial and valuable information should be kept in secret. Despite the fact that many people prefer the former point, I would like to choose the latter one because of the following reasons. This essay will first discuss about sharing much information and then it will explain why I am in favor of the latter opinion.
People prefer to provide information freely, because it contains two main advantages. First of all, there are many people who are short in cash, especially in a developing country like Vietnam so sharing them the information freely would lend them a helping hand in the studying process. Then, these people will take advantage of this to study hard and after graduating, they can be able to secure a job with high salary in the future. As a result, the rate of unemployed will decrease. Secondly, this free information would be a great source for the media to public articles, both offline and online, which can be an entertainment to interest us after a hard day at workplace.
Although providing information for free has advantages, I believe some crucial information should not be spreaded. The first reason amongst all is that some information are found by all the great effort of some people, so it would be unreasonable to provide them freely to those who do nothing. For example, people have to make purchase to listen to music posting on Sportify. Furthermore, forcing people to pay money to own this information makes them appreciate the effort of others as well as encourage to work harder to earn money to afford this information. As a result, the higher income of those people will boost the nation’s economy.
All in all, sharing information freely is a positive thing in some extent, but not all the information can be free but people have to purchase to access it
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how coffee beans are processed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 59
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is to provide free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The Early Bird Gets the Bad Grade 70
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...e effort of others as well as encourage to work harder to earn money to afford this inf...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will boost the nation's economy. All in all, sharing information freely i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, for example, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87164179104 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70174155692 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519402985075 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.213456348 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304832445578 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104502417586 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844891313223 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198637526512 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410641529025 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.