tpo integrated 16
Both reading and lecture talk about the problems faced the archaeologists in discovering the old artifacts of Britain. The reading says that there are mainly three problems faced the archaeologists. On the other hand, the lecture says that the government provided solutions for those problems.
First, the reading stated that many valuable artifacts lost due to construction projects. While digging foundations for the new constructions, many valuable archaeological sites got uncovered, but the builders just proceed with the construction without paying any attention to those valuable things. Yet, the lecture doesn't agree. It says, due to the new guidelines every construction site must be examined archaeologically first. If any artifact discovered so new rules for the construction site should be followed.
Second, the reading says that there is no enough financial support for the archaeological researches. Most of the archaeological research are funded through the government which allowed the archaeologists to investigate just few of the important sites and leave hundreds not investigated. On the other hand, the lecture has a different opinion. It states that now archaeological researches are paid by the construction companies. This provides much more funds. the construction companies fund the examination process and then the other steps in the research process.
Third, the lecture states that it is really hard to find a job in the archaeological field. Jobs are available only at universities and few other governmental agencies. As a result, a lot of archaeologists seeking other jobs. On contrary, the lecture doesn't agree. it says due to the new regulation; any construction company need to hire archaeologists to help in the process starting from examination ending by writing reports. This long process will provide a lot of positions to many archaeologists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- peopel live longer nowadys 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 84
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- integraded tpo 33 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...those valuable things. Yet, the lecture doesnt agree. It says, due to the new guidelin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...mpanies. This provides much more funds. the construction companies fund the examina...
^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng other jobs. On contrary, the lecture doesnt agree. it says due to the new regulatio...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... On contrary, the lecture doesnt agree. it says due to the new regulation; any con...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, then, third, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55902777778 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34151015323 2.5805825403 129% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2065742076 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.05 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347527305526 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963149427888 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672242409829 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204055998378 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659742425889 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.