Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern education, apart from teaching and studying, other activities play a crucial role in schools all over the world. In fact, some people consider unpaid community service as an indispensible part of every high school program. Personally, I totally agree that high schools should include these activities in their programs because of its benefits for students.
Firstly, it is obvious that by joining in unpaid community activities, students can create an ideal environment for advancing their social skills. Indeed, students do not only go to school for learning mathematics or physics, but they also should learn real life skills. For instance, students working for a charity are definitely good at teamwork skills because they know exactly what they need to do to cooperate with others. Another example can be found in students who teach sports to young children. It is obviously a great opportunity to improve their healths and flexibilities as well as boost their communication skills. Conclusively, unpaid community service brings a lot of benefits for students in terms of enhancing their skills belonging to the society.
Lastly, these community services are extremely useful to students’ opportunities in the future because of diplomas they received. In fact, there are thousands of job chances in which certificatications from these services can show how energetic students are. More specifically, employers have a tendency to give a priority to candidates who earned diplomas of community services when they were high school students. Also, these certificatications are one of the requirements for students who want to apply for studying abroad. Indeed, it can become an incredible strength and highlight students’ profiles to debate others. Needless to say, it is undeniable that certificates from unpaid community services of high school programs play a significant role in student’s future opportunities.
As discussed, thanks to the unpaid community service, students can find a lot of great chances to improve their social skills and take advantages of beneficial certificates for their future career
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | Ankita7443 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | prajwal mukkawar | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | mitss99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | aycorek | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | pramodj | 56 | view |
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. . 61
- Nowadays the way manypeople interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people believe that schools should only teach children subjects which are beneficial for their future career and therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that schools should only teach children subjects which are beneficial for their future career and therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement There is nothing that young people can teach older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your position 36
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, well, apart from, for instance, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5487804878 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14575055899 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551829268293 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7094298029 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296099092957 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103933380324 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678153105148 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183175932553 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651035255726 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.