Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Growing traffic and pollution are two problems that we are struggling to sort out. It become huge problem both in the cities and motorways everywhere. Some people belive that increasing the price of petrol is best approach to this. Personally it is good idea but it's not most effective solution.
Firstly, we can easily understand that private car use is one of the main cause of the increases in traffic and pollution. Higher cost of fuel are unlikely to limit the number of driving for a long. As this policy also affect the cost of public transport. Therefore, Government can take some important steps to tackle such serious issues. There are so many measures that could be implemented which shows a huge effect on these problems.
I think to tackle the problem of pollution, cleaner fuel is to be developed. Eco-friendly vehicle should be used to maintain air quality. For example, in Japan or Singapore, resident stimulated to use biology power for their private car and lots of electrical car used, thats why thease are the cleanest countries in the world. Neatherland is one of the countries used solar powered bike in transport.
However, traffic congestion will not be solved easily by changing the type of vehicle that we use. To do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport service available to travelers. For example, if sufficient Sky train & Underground train system were built then traffic on our road would be decreased dramatically. In Europe countries like German or England benefits for Health of walking or travelling by bike are usually posted daily on Newspaper.
In conclusion, i think long term traffic and pollution reduction depends on educationg the public to use Public Transport more. Also by encouraging people to use biology gas or travelled by bike or by foot are always most effective.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Growing traffic and pollution are two pr...
^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... that we are struggling to sort out. It become huge problem both in the cities and mot...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ive that increasing the price of petrol is best approach to this. Personally it is good...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...limit the number of driving for a long. As this policy also affect the cost of pub...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...te car and lots of electrical car used, thats why thease are the cleanest countries i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ed daily on Newspaper. In conclusion, i think long term traffic and pollution r...
^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he public to use Public Transport more. Also by encouraging people to use biology ga...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98045602606 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73495169719 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3937000133 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4736842105 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115003071643 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343569191347 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537100414482 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675381997219 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576631830863 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.