teachers should be paid as much as doctors, lawyers or businessmen.
A high salary represents this line of work is being recognized and appreciated. It has been argued that teachers deserve to be paid as well as doctors, lawyers and businessmen. I think this is not such a bad idea.
First, a decent paycheck would enhance teachers’ motivation. They have to spend hours checking books, studying material and doing research before class to get fully prepared. And right after class there will be questions to be answered and papers to be graded, all of which takes great patience and persistence. Naturally, some may argue that such effort does not equal to that of life-saving duties in the ER or evidence-citing moments in the courtroom. But let’s look at this issue more closely, education is just equally, if not more, important than other fields. Can you imagine how our children will turn out to be if they are being guided by people who don’t take pride in what they do or who think their job is less respectable? Not only can good teachers impart knowledge, but they also pass on important values to the next generation. Who can deny the value of an educator who tries to help a juvenile delinquent get back on track? And who can make light of a teacher who manages to inspire an introvert who shows promise in painting to pursue arts? But it cannot be possible without giving these educators due respect and credit. Only when they are held in high regard will they start to show a better performance at work.
Additionally, this policy can help produce a more educated and competent workforce. When teachers receive a salary as much as lawyers and doctors, it sends a positive message to talents who have excelled in all walks of life. In the past, such talented elites would go for more profitable jobs; but the salary-raising policy would offer them an incentive to take teaching as their profession. In this case, students would learn from the best. A student who has his heart set on becoming a lawyer would be thrilled to find that he can learn from someone who had previously made partner in a law firm. And for a young man majoring in medicine, there’s no better choice than to have an experienced doctor coach him. Jobs in such highly specialized areas like aerospace engineering, finance and IT all require extensive knowledge and proper guidance from a mentor. Without leading experts as teachers, schools have no hope of ever cultivating a competent labor pool.
All in all, teachers deserve equally high salaries as their counterparts in other fields like business or medicine, for the benefits of their own self-esteem and the educated workforce they can bring to the society.
- You will need to accomplish an assignment to do a presentation Which will you choose 1 Act out a scene from a play with a partner 2 Explain your review of a novel you recently you read 3 Read a selection of poem 60
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 3
- teachers should be paid as much as doctors lawyers or businessmen 95
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 75
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. First, t 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, well, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.859030837 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72150803579 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588105726872 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9989164871 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9130434783 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7391304348 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69565217391 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190716420382 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570361518443 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10939917771 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13838612 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110955314658 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.