Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does.
Success has several determinants including work ethic, principles. Work ethics is primary determinant of success since most of the time it assures achievement. Nonetheless it is worth to mention that sometimes there comes out a result connected to being luckiness rather than amount of effort devoted to issue. In my opinion, work ethics are quaranteed your wisdom, honesty and trusthfulness. Deviating from luck by trusting on luck may damage your name permenantly.
Firstly, work ethics provide fair rivalry conditions, violating this may bring short run successes but tremendous losses in long run. For instance, an American law firm violated some client rules and won I the court but after a while, truth has come out private firm which they supported paid far more amounts and firm lost its reputation due to corruption as a result. Furthermore, construction firms can earn high amounts rapidly, bad reputation lead them bankrupcy with same speed.. This illustrates in business you can earn by changing conditions unfairly and you can keep it behind by luck but in the end this come out and damage your business much more than losing the battle.
Secondly, work ethic implies hard working brings big success, hence effort deserves an award. For instance, many atheletes earn their prizes due to their intense training, practice and ambition not by luck. There are lots of cases awarded by hard working rather than superstitious belief of luckiness. Hoping for luck keeps you motionless and steal your passionate and ambition, followingly, you become a person standing and waiting for a miracle at a time.
On the other hand, there are instances that luck play role in results such that college admissions, hiring new employers which are issues directly connected to networks. For example, if an academic has a friend of a colleague, so he or she recommends and gain priority against others. Additionally, in some years, college admissions are capriciously competitive this abates your chance of placement in a higher ranking college. In summary, in some specific cases, work ethics is not mere determinant of success unfortunately.
In conclusion, all things considered, while work ethics assures wisdom, honesty and generally success, it is open to dispute luck assures such things, undoubtedly, luck brings the situations to depend on chance, uncertainty.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 16
- gre argument essay 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 83
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 83
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...ost of the time it assures achievement. Nonetheless it is worth to mention that sometimes t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...tion lead them bankrupcy with same speed.. This illustrates in business you can ea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in summary, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30585106383 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85220359681 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622340425532 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.685466942 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6111111111 5.21951772744 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365122460695 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111756192301 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926866369927 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195743357601 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710679478234 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.