Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom helped to address the specific problems discussed in the reading passage.
The passage provides information about three main problems connected with archaeology in Britain. It mentions that though this country has got a rich history, most of important artifacts were destroyed. On the other hand, the lecturer points out that the new guidelines turned the situation to better.
The first problem emerged in the passage is that a lot of important items were lost to building projects. In the past even if builders found a historic thing, they kept constructing that place. Nowadays as the lecturer says before any building projects the spot must be examined by archeologists to decide whether there is something valuable for them. If so, getting together with the officials and builders they need either build around or dig up an item.
The second problem which was mentioned is the problem of finding financial aid for archeologists. It provides that funds were not enough for good quality work. The lecturer contradicts this information by saying that now it is responsible of construction companies to pay to archeologists for their job. Thus, they provide more money than the government did.
The last point in the passage is about the problem to find a job for current and future archeologists. It says that many people find a job which is far away from this occupation. On the opposite, the lecturer says that currently there are more work for prospective archeologists than before, and that they can be involved in any type of work, for example, assisting an item, drawing plans to preserve it, performing research, and processing the data.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-26 | kiarashk | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | arizaturan | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | arizaturan | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a significa 66
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 29
- Some people are always in a hurry to go places and get things done Other people prefer to take their time and live life at a slower pace Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 29
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes, which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated, are far more successful than are other methods at deterring che 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08846153846 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81389988173 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607692307692 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5037644751 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0707159807979 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272126677584 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358945684702 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475300013912 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022595197577 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.