Each year, there is an alarming disappearance of considerable languages. I am totally in favour of life being fairly convenient with a significant decline of numerous languages. This essay will first discuss on how people may benefit speaking a single major language as opposed to different dialects and secondly, the major drawback of the extinctions of diverse languages with relevant examples.
On the one hand, generally speaking, communication becomes remarkably effective provided that there exist fewer languages. Since more accents imply supplementary terminologies, complicated vocabulari...
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 85
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 90
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or working a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 87
Essay evaluation report
Not only would a language affects cultural integraties
Not only would a language affect cultural integraties
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1846 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.577 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.195 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 105 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 68 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.141 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.518 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a language' or 'another language'.
Suggestion: a language; another language
... language that cannot be transferred to an another language. When their values are gradually replac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dialects'' or 'dialect's'?
Suggestion: dialects'; dialect's
... In conclusion, dwindling of numerous dialects comes in handy in the lives of people d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73716012085 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29853475119 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640483383686 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5585581666 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207093776758 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580407325514 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480057938821 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109372402591 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605979547394 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.