People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There has been a dispute between acting upon emotion versus acting upon logic. Emotion and logic are two extremely complex bases of the thought process. Is one more justifiable than the other? Does one provide more reservation than the other? Decisions are not made equally. There are some flaws in the statement that emotional actions can be supported by logical reasons after.
Those, who make decisions base on emotion, are impulsive and uncontrollable. There was hardly any logic considered when they acted. A young college student decides to put off studying for an important exam due to the fact that it was her birthday. As it was her 21st birthday, she believed it was necessary for her to celebrate this milestone and have her first sip of alcohol. Because she did not fail her exam the following day, she stated that her celebration will be a momentous memory that will always be cherished. This may be an exaggeration, but many people can relate to this type of behavior thought process. Even though things worked out in her favor, it does not equate to her emotional based action to be properly accounted for logically. The college student made a poor choice as an adult.
There are other cases where this statement does not hold true. There are times in our lives when we have to make choices based on how we feel and what will provide the best outcome. Some people have a nitch that allows them to sense things better than others. There are times that we must use our senses to make emotions and it will make sense logically in the future. A student felt as though he couldn't continue on with his studies in pharmacy because the profession didn't fit his professional goals. He couldn't explain it beyond that because the career pays well and has good hours. Though others found him to be too picky at the time, he ended up pursuing a career that loves and will flourish in. He acted on emotions, but he was logically able to solidify his decision. Not all emotional choice make a person a poor decision maker.
Though this statement has some particularly solid standing that poor decision makers tend to use logic to hide their emotion choices, every circumstance is different. Some may have the statement may qualify for and others where it is exactly the opposite. We cannot hold everyone accountable and generalize them as poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- “Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of l 50
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 79
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...the future. A student felt as though he couldnt continue on with his studies in pharmac...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...dies in pharmacy because the profession didnt fit his professional goals. He couldnt ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...on didnt fit his professional goals. He couldnt explain it beyond that because the care...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce make a person a poor decision maker. Though this statement has some particula...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ery circumstance is different. Some may have the statement may qualify for and other...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78048780488 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46072782721 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529268292683 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7681794124 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3846153846 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7692307692 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11538461538 5.21951772744 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203576715171 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621713682403 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631895617521 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131907224167 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337048057303 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.