the average annual expenditure of college students from three countries.
The table compares the average annual expenditure of college students from three countries in terms of total costs and different living expenses.
Overall, It is clear that the total expenditure of college students in country A was the highest among three countries. In addition, college students in all three countries spent most of their budget on accommodation and food.
In country A, students spent a total of $5000 per year, compared with $4500 per year for students in countries B and C respectively.
Regarding accommodation, students in country A costed 45% of their total expenditure, which meant that it was much higher than the figures for students in country B, at 35%, students in country C, at 30%. In contrast, spending on the food of students in country C accounted for the highest percentage, at 36%, while the figures saw only 28% in country B and 22% in country A. Moreover, students in all three countries spent a lot on enjoying their leisure time, at 22%, 23% and 12% in country A, B and C in turn. As for books, 21% of total expenditure of students in country C spent on, considerably ahead of that for students in country A, at 3%, and country B, at 9%. Spending on others amounted to 8% in country A, 5% in country B and 1% in country c.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries. 73
- the chart below shows the most popular films by genre for men and women and general ticket sales for different types of film in the USA in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 56
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, while, as for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61333333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80995057291 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462222222222 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5890193698 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254947248743 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157024424746 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145523124422 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247295111719 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165507033111 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.