TPO-40: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
In the lecture, the professor proposes a solution to overcome the extreme situations on Venus that make it inhabitable for humans. Although as mentioned in the passage, living on Venus's surface is thought to be impossible, the professor suggests that by building a station which is floating in the atmosphere of the planet, we could ensure a habitable environment on Venus. Through this method, the challenges stated in the passage can be overcome.
To begin with, on a floating station about 50km above the surface of Venus, the extreme pressure would be reduced to an amount similar to Earth's pressure. Thus the challenge regarding high pressure that would crush anything related to humans landing on Venus would be solved.
Secondly, the passage issues that on the surface of Venus there are no traces of water. Also, the atmosphere of the planet contains very little oxygen or water vapor which is inadequate for humans. It is implied in the text that a constant supply of these two vital substances is required from Earth to maintain any viable station on Venus. However, the professor mentions that with regard to the chemical material already present in the atmosphere of Venus, such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, the essential water and oxygen can be made through chemical processes on the floating station. Through this, adequate amounts of water and oxygen can be produced without the need to import any chemical substances from Earth.
The third problem stated in the passage is that because Venus's atmosphere is shrouded with thick clouds, most of the sunlight reaching the planet is reflected. Whereas, on a station 50km above the surface, the layer of clouds is much thinner, thus more sunlight will reach the habitable station. Also, where the passage implies that the lack of sunlight prohibited humans to attain enough electrical power needed for their utilities, the professor argues that on the floating, ample amounts of sunlight can be gathered from both the sunlight reaching the station, and the light reflected from the layers of cloud bellow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-01 | william1024 | 70 | view |
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-47: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 73
- TPO-40: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o an amount similar to Earths pressure. Thus the challenge regarding high pressure t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is required from Earth to maintain any viable station on Venus. However, the pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thus, whereas, such as, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 30.3222958057 185% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11143695015 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52728082597 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513196480938 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1504662475 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.076923077 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424229142203 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146647227202 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054294259235 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246033199399 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631278794707 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.