The author discusses several possible reasons scientists provide for the Little Ice Age. However, The speaker disagrees each reason in the passage and states that they are out of date.
First the author suggests that disruption of ocean currents may caused the Little Ice Age, but the professor explains that according to new researches such disruption only affects Europe and north America and argues that this reason will not explain the phenomena in the southern hemisphere.
Next the passage tells us about volcanic eruptions that caused sunlight blockage which results in temperature reduction. However, the speaker challenged this reason by saying that if such eruptions were happened, the people would noticed its visual effects, but there has been no report from that period supporting this reason.
Finally the author states the decrease in human population following by absorbing green house gases by trees as the cause of Little Ice Age. But the professor says such phenomena needs a lot of more time to take place. He also asserts that this reason cannot explain the long period of Little Ice Age.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree. 76
- TPO 30 66
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?-A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner (s 60
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Burning Mirror 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'notice'
Suggestion: notice
...uptions were happened, the people would noticed its visual effects, but there has been ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... that period supporting this reason. Finally the author states the decrease in human...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21666666667 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38158443991 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3241379258 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349367720305 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149913914595 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928076783105 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206321849817 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573861343158 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.