Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
Nowadays, every child should attend a school to learn new science and life materials. As students should go to school, some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. However, I disagree with this suggestion and I would explain in the following paragraphs why it would have negative effects on child's educational progress.
First of all, children at the ages below 13 years old need more attention compare to their older counterparts. Having a different teacher for each subject will prevent teachers from paying enough attention to a student. This will cause children to have lower performance on their courses and consequently make them reluctant to attend school. On the other hand, when students at this age have several teachers, there will be no time for the teachers to become familiar with children's personalities and as a result, give them more attention.
Second, a student at this age needs help to find out his/her abilities. Since a single teacher has an overall assessment of each student, he can provide valuable information to child parents. For instance, when a teacher knows a student perform good on math but not on language skills, he can inform his/her parents that their child needs tutoring on languages. In addition, as the teacher knows his students, he can organize the students based on their abilities and ask them to work as a group, in this way they learn how they can conquer their shortcomings in a particular subject.
As I stated in the previous paragraphs, students at the age below 13 years old can benefit more from having a single teacher.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 76
- Burning Mirror 71
- Monitoring or observing children while they are playing with their friends is an effective way to solve children's misbehavior problem. 73
- Nowadays, parents don't have the time to play with their children anymore. What activity should they ask the children to do during the period: have fun playing games/sports, or spend time with schoolwork? 63
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 271.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0036900369 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7047542573 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583025830258 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4704962951 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332623738367 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13244760104 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129513078142 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200122855517 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638148267815 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.