Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Working in a group in the school years is so important since it could learn students to be a team player in their future career. Although some people adamantly claim that working alone could be more effective for students and propose some reasons, others take an opposite point of view. Personally, I believe that working in a group with other students is a better way to learn both the subjects and being a good team player. I fell this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the student could learn more from each other when they have more interaction than usual. Each student has a special talent in different subjects so they could help each other by having more discussions. My own example could elucidate this argument. I can remember when I was a high school student, my teachers in biology and history decided to assign a mixed project. We were able to choose one of our classmates as our partner doing the mixed project. As I was absent because of an illness at the mentioned session, I chose my partner later than my friend. So I was forced to choose a partner who I never had any relation before. We decided to have more meetings to do the project as well as we could. At first, it was a tough time for me working with an unfamiliar classmate. Eventually, I found out that he was an ingenious student in history who could learn me a plenty of subjects which I was in trouble with them. As a result, we did the best project in the class since we had a comprehensive understanding of both subjects.
Second, by being in a group, each student can choose his favorite part doing it better and more concentrated. When you pursue your favorite field, definitely, you would devote more time without being tired, since the subject itself will motivate you. As I mentioned in the previous paragraph, the mixed project was so interesting for me as well since I was really interested in searching and studying biology topics. I chose the biology segment to work on and my partner chose the history. Both of us were interested in doing our part so we spend a lot of time in the library to collect our required data. Although we spend roughly ten hours a day in the library, we never felt fatigue or disappointed because of having passion on the subjects. Eventually, we matched our data together and do our best which leads to the best grade in the class and learning a myriad of things.
All in all, working in a group is more effective than working alone since the students could learn more from each other and each student coud concentrate on his own interest to do a better job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 92
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 78
- reading passage.题目原文：In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinde 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, well, as for, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53151260504 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52590822855 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447478991597 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9564676616 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7826086957 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6956521739 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259555858818 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770499436373 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619012501453 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178334688334 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358000444418 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.