The tables compare working hours of full-time and part-time workers in Greece, Netherlands, and the UK compared to European average in 2002.
The given tables summarize how many hours full-time and part-time workers had to do in 3 European countries in comparison to an average working hour in 2002.
For full-time workers, apart from Greece which had the highest working hours, the Netherlands and the UK both had lower average hours. To be more specific, male workers in Greece worked 2.1 hours more than average, which was 42.5 hours. Meanwhile, men in the Netherlands and the UK could rest more as they only spent 38 and 37.5 hours working. Similarly, Greek women spent 39.9 hours working, higher by 0.7, 1.9 and 2.9 hours compared to the European average, the Netherlands and the UK respectively.
A different picture occurred to part-timers as the average working hours in 3 surveyed countries were less than that of the average, which was 32 hours. Men in Greece, the Netherlands, and the UK spent the total of 30, 28.3 and 29 hours working part-time, whereas the amount of time women spent was 29.3, 29.2 and 28 hours respectively compared to 34 hours in average.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-22 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
- The table shows how many international students studies in Canada and the US by the country of origin 67
- The diagrams below show how a park in a city changed over time 78
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Plan A shows a health center in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 78
- The map shows the ground floor of a library in 2001 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... Netherlands and the UK could rest more as they only spent 38 and 37.5 hours worki...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85310734463 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6226619144 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4297234836 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468173276337 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204596854886 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132896290354 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346611241926 0.15604864568 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897614173356 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.