Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.
School curriculums may vary from school to school but their primary objective is same everywhere - to educate and enlighten students. However, some people claim that school should focus more on job-oriented subjects rather than teaching traditional ones like arts and history. I personally disagree with this view and believe that traditional subjects are just as important as skill-oriented subjects are.
To begin with, ‘job-oriented subject’ is itself an inexplicit term. Some would say that subjects that enhance practical skills like computing or gardening are job-oriented subjects but who can assure that all students in a class would become computer engineers and specialists in planting and gardening? No one can and that is why forcing pupils to study subjects that they do not feel interested in would bring catastrophic results.
Furthermore, schools are meant to nurture young students’ creativity, foster their talent and open many windows of wisdom to let them explore their true interests. From this perspective, imposing job-related subjects is like killing the inner sole of the future generation. Finally, if schools can bring diversity among students and inform them about different perspectives of life, the students would themselves choose their career and outshine in future, there is no need to create a robotic generation with a particular skill only.
Arts and history are as much important as any science and technical subjects are. The study of history empowers us to be prepared for the future and learn from our past mistakes. Similarly, arts and other traditional subjects allow us to learn to appreciate the life. We revere Van Gauge and Leonardo da Vinci as much as we admire Sir Isaac Newton and Einstein. The world needs great artists and historian no less than it needs scientists and technicians.
To conclude, schools should equally focus on traditional subjects and skill oriented subjects and nurture students’ hidden potential to prepare the future generation to become leaders, not corporate slaves.
[Collected]
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | Shimaa | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-30 | Anandeep | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 89 | view |
| 2018-01-02 | ManishaDahatonde | 84 | view |
| 2017-12-17 | cta | 78 | view |
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 61
- Many people complain about commercial advertisements and their influence on children. Should it be controlled by the government? What are the possible effects on children? 78
- Many people complain about commercial advertisements and their influence on children. Should it be controlled by the government? What are the possible effects on children? 73
- Some people say a person s success in adult life is the result of the way they brought up as a child by their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- You have recently visited a tourist attraction and were very pleased by the help given to you by the staff. Write a letter to the staff manager and say– Give details of your visit.– Describe how the staff helped you.– What do you want the manager to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...selves choose their career and outshine in future, there is no need to create a robotic g...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, similarly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.528125 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98563636676 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8691328016 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247124795558 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785460637719 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085834196547 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139770319387 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841504310973 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.