Birds and glass
The reading passage states that glass which is used in buildings is dangerous for wild birds and provides three solutions for this problem. However, the professor claims that none of the solutions are effective and refutes all of them.
First, the article posits that by replacing of clear glass with one-way glass, the birds will distinguish the glass. The lecturer refutes this solution by saying that one-way glass is like mirror and birds do not understand mirror. He explains that birds will see the reflection of sky or trees on the glass and they will try to fly on it which leads to damage them. So, this is not an effective solution.
Second, the reading passage argues that by painting colorful lines or other designs on window, birds can distinguish the glass. The professor opposes this point by discussing that the birds will see the open spaces between lines as holes and will fly right through them. According to the professor, for solving this problem, designs should be very close with small open areas and this kind of designs make the inside of buildings too dark for people which makes this solution unacceptable.
Finally, the article holds the view that using magnetic fields in the buildings will guide birds away from buildings. However, the professor casts doubt on this view and contends that the birds use magnetic fields to find their way in long trips. He explains that the birds use their eyes or brightness to fly in short distances. So, in this case magnetic fields will not work.
Overall, while the passage brings three solutions to solve the problem of building glass for birds, the lecturer prefers to differ by providing counter arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | guna | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
- The widespread use of internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in availability of information influence life in today’s world. 73
- TPO_42 63
- tpo 41 80
- Chaco Structure 70
- People today spent too much time on personal enjoyment "doing things they like do rather than things they should do. 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, in short, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92605633803 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32531702911 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6491695225 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9285714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365560553493 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148150426843 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141214463808 0.0662205650399 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211373802319 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132606755265 0.0443174109184 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.