The line graph represents the energy usage from various sources of energy in the USA from 1980 and expected trend till 2030.
As evident from the graph, petrol and oil were the major energy sources in the United States and continue to be so in the coming years.
It is lucid from the line graph that the consumption of petrol and oil started at 35 quadrillion units in 1980 and increased steadily to approximately 40 quadrillion units in 2015. This trend will continue to reach 45 quadrillion units by 2030. Furthermore, the usage of coal and natural gas initiated at 15 and 20 quadrillion units respectively. The consumption of natural gas reduced till 1990 and increased to little over 20 quadrillion units thereafter till 2015 and will remain stable until 2030. On the other hand, the coal usage rose sharply from the beginning and is expected to touch 30 quadrillion units by the year 2030.
The usage of nuclear power and renewable energy sources like hydropower, wind, and solar commenced at a little under 5 quadrillion units back in the year 1980. After 1990, the nuclear power rose slightly till 2005 while hydropower and solar/wind delined. It is noted that the trend for solar/wind and nuclear energy will rise slightly after 2030 whereas the hydropower will remain stable.
- The Graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with Projection Until 2030. 67
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such asAustralia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college oruniversity.Why do so many people want to study in English?Why is English such an important international langu 67
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things. This has made our lives generally more comfortable but many traditional values and customs have been lost and this is a pity.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- By investing in tourism we can earn a lot of revenue and growth in national economy at the same time it damages the local culture What is your opinion 91
- The chart illustrates housing preferences among people who lived in the British cities of London Oxford and Cambridge in the year 2005 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oximately 40 quadrillion units in 2015. It is expected to reach 45 quadrillion uni...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90454545455 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62509740079 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472727272727 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1796816359 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179224172505 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822345043453 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768770073515 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138533022679 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883550282257 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.